资料下载专区 | |||
托福TPO写作范文 | 托福考后回忆试题 | 托福教师预测试题 | 托福15天小练习 |
导语:托福写作考什么?主要包括综合写作和独立写作,针对托福写作水平较为薄弱的考生,我们提供了托福TPO写作精选范文。在日常备考中多读多背范文,了解托福写作思路,才能有所进步。更多托福题目分享请点击进入托福听力、托福口语、托福阅读、托福写作等频道,新东方托福考试网祝您考试顺利!
In the lecture, the professor is skeptical about the idea of the reading passage that the vessels were not used as electric batteries in ancient times. The professor argues that the arguments in the reading are unconvincing.
In the reading passage, no electricity conductors, to which the batteries would have been attached, were found. On the contrary, the professor says that the site was found by untrained local people. They were not archaeologists, so they would have not realized the importance of other materials found on the site. They would have overlooked these materials as uninteresting and thrown them away.
The professor then opposes the reading’s idea the function of the vessels was the same as that of those found in the ruins of Seleucia, namely to hold scrolls of sacred texts, since they looked similar. The professor states that the vessels were originally designed to hold the scrolls, but later inventors discovered that with iron rods and some liquid, they could be used to generate electricity; that was how the first battery was born.
Finally, the professor disproves the reading’s idea that the vessels would have been completely useless to ancient people as they had no devices that relied on electricity. The professor points out that the battery could generate some mild shock and this interprets evidence of some invisible power and people could convince others they had the magic power. Also it could be used for healing. In modern society doctors would use batteries to stimulate muscles and release pains. In ancient times people could also do that.