托福独立写作题目:
The government should support artists or should artists support themselves.
Introduction:
People contend that
the government is not obligated to offer any kind of financial support to
artists because they are just like other able-bodied and able-minded adults
who are supposed to make a living by themselves. |
引出话题:
又见用反方观点和反方理由引出话题。 |
But from my
perspective, being artists is a unique profession and they deserve the extra
attention from governments. |
我方观点+ 下文总结:
转折表达我方观点:艺术需要政府支持。 |
Body paragraph 1
First of all,
financial support to artists would enable current artists to contribute more
to our society. |
主题句:
扩展支持艺术利一:有利于艺术繁荣。 |
It is not uncommon
in history that great artists were barricaded by financial problems or even
gave up their callings eventually due to their pennilessness like Van Gogh
and great Chinese painter Baishi Qi. Since artistic creation is a tedious and
long-term process without tangible rewards, most artists might find it hard
to afford their own living. |
背景信息:
为什么作者会提出此分论点?历史上很多伟大的艺术家都因穷困放弃艺术。 |
If governments, at
this point, assumed the responsibility to support artists, these talented and
creative people would no doubt accomplish more truly innovative artistic
works. After all, in order to devote their heart and soul to the pursuit of
their real interest, people should first have the ability to support their
basic necessities of life. |
解释主题句:
写完背景,引入段落最重要的环节—解释主题句:政府若能资助艺术家,他们就能创造出更多伟大的艺术作品。毕竟,温饱是追求理想的前提。 |
The United States
movie industry is a great case in point. Due to the effective financial
support given by the U.S. government, movie industry in this country is
booming. Based on the subsidy offered by governments, filmmakers here are
free and bold to explore every possibility. They can just let their wild
imagination surge and their creative ideas spark. So, there is no wonder that
people around the globe are willing to go to movie to appreciate the great
and inspired films made by these innovative movie directors. |
举例论证:
作者用美国政府对于电影业的支持细化前方逻辑链:What kinds of
specific support do governments give to artist? à How flourishing is art? |
Moreover, supporting art financially can benefit the whole society. |
主题句: 扩展支持艺术利二:有利于整个社会。 |
It is tempting to think that it is not a necessary function for government to devote their limited budget to art. After all, art is never the basic needs for people. Query whether a starving person will prefer a good painting to even a bad meal? |
段内让步: 作者在解释主题句之前先扔出一个错误理念作为让步:很多人会认为艺术并不值得政府花钱,毕竟,艺术并不是人们的基本需求。 |
However, the advocates of this argument forget that by allocating money to the arts governments actually help to solve those most pressing social problems they are concerned about like unemployment and starvation. |
解释主题句: 转折,再次强调主题句。
|
Return to the above-mentioned example. Nowadays, movie industry has become a multibillion business and it provides numerous job opportunities not only for directors and actors but also for artists in various fields ranging from musicians who are responsible for theme song and background music, fashion designers who are in charge of all the costumes to special effects make-up artists whose creativity and imagination give life to those monsters, beasts and fairies in movies. As a result, not only the GDP figure rises due to larger sum of national revenue, but social welfare increases thanks to people's stable lives and high satisfaction towards their jobs. |
举例论证: 作者继续以美国电影业为例细化主题句:美国电影业的繁荣为导演,演员和各种艺术家都提供了就业机会。GDP因此增长,社会福利也因此提高。 |
Conclusion
Combining the two advantages
mentioned in the passage above, supporting art can not only encourage artists
to be more committed to their cause, but also benefit the nation as a whole.
Thus, it is wise for governments to support art development. |
重述观点:
总结分论点并且重述观点。 |
白瑜简介: 集团培训师;集团优秀老师;北美VIP优秀老师。北航学士硕士。著有《SAT作文精讲精析》。2010年加入新东方成为VIP第一批教师,在新东方的五年见证了我的成长和成熟;在教学写作过程中不断提高自己的英语能力与修养,并在讲课过程中逐渐形成了自己的讲课风格,高屋建瓴,深入浅出;课下亦不断研究教学方法,不断精进。工作努力出色。坚信学无止境,天道酬勤。
推荐阅读
更多托福解析,预测及备考辅导请扫一扫上方二维码,关注新东方托福微信!
(编辑:Joe)
版权声明:本文系新东方网独家稿件,版权为新东方网所有。转载须注明来源及作者,否则必将追究法律责任。